<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disruptive Thoughts - Latest Comments in Links of the Moment</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disruptivethoughts.disqus.com/links_of_the_moment/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:27:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Links of the Moment</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2008/01/30/links-of-the-moment/#comment-5731684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What if the truth doesn't even lie in the middle but is some blended combination of the two? I don't know what I think about this - haven't thought it through fully, but think about Gladwell's influencers, Watts' societal readiness, and Rogers' classic adoption curve. Doesn't it feel like there's something linking the three together?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fraser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Links of the Moment</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2008/01/30/links-of-the-moment/#comment-5731683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you that Watt's and Gladwell are not mutually exclusive. As usual, the truth is probably somewhere in between.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neilperkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:08:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>