<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disruptive Thoughts - Latest Comments in It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disruptivethoughts.disqus.com/it8217s_the_value_stupid/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:15:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2006/02/28/its-the-value-stupid/#comment-5730373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Welcome to Disruptive Thoughts, hopefully you'll find it interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that, with respect to Web 2.0, attention is focused incorrectly in a number of areas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Design seems to win out over content way too often. This is part of the reason why I'm not fixing my template (it doesn't format properly in IE) --- content is what matters, and in the time it would take for a guy like me to fix my template I can post 1 or 2 more times. When I read comments about the potential success of variouis Web 2.0 services I cringe when I read that the services "ajaxy goodness" will help make it successful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By "ideas over business sense" do you mean "ideals over business sense"? If so, I agree that it's a tiresome focus. Web 2.0 is about technological innovations changing an industry, which will impact other industries significantly. What it won't do is change the way that capitalism operates (and I don't mean that in the "evil" sense - I mean it as a market place). We've had technology change a number of industries and,yet, business continues.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fraser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2006/02/28/its-the-value-stupid/#comment-5730376</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark,  Welcome to Disruptive Thoughts, hopefully you'll find it interesting.  I agree that, with respect to Web 2.0, attention is focused incorrectly in a number of areas.   Design seems to win out over content way too often. This is part of the reason why I'm not fixing my template (it doesn't format properly in IE) --- content is what matters, and in the time it would take for a guy like me to fix my template I can post 1 or 2 more times. When I read comments about the potential success of variouis Web 2.0 services I cringe when I read that the services "ajaxy goodness" will help make it successful.  By "ideas over business sense" do you mean "ideals over business sense"? If so, I agree that it's a tiresome focus. Web 2.0 is about technological innovations changing an industry, which will impact other industries significantly. What it won't do is change the way that capitalism operates (and I don't mean that in the "evil" sense - I mean it as a market place). We've had technology change a number of industries and,yet, business continues.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fraser</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2006/02/28/its-the-value-stupid/#comment-5730372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great blog and insightful commentary. Subscribed!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have noticed that attention is given to services that are representative of the Web 2.0 mind-set, which values design over content, disruption over evolution, and ideas over business sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Devlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2006/02/28/its-the-value-stupid/#comment-5730375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great blog and insightful commentary. Subscribed!  I have noticed that attention is given to services that are representative of the Web 2.0 mind-set, which values design over content, disruption over evolution, and ideas over business sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Devlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2006/02/28/its-the-value-stupid/#comment-5730371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point.  I don't know why business always has to equate evil.  Look at Flickr.  They provide a great service that people really enjoy and are willing to pay for.  Programmers, geeks, techies: they all have to eat too so if they are providing a great service/product (that probably costs them a lot of time and money to create and maintain) why shouldn't they get paid?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s the Value, Stupid</title><link>http://disruptivethoughts.com/2006/02/28/its-the-value-stupid/#comment-5730374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point.  I don't know why business always has to equate evil.  Look at Flickr.  They provide a great service that people really enjoy and are willing to pay for.  Programmers, geeks, techies: they all have to eat too so if they are providing a great service/product (that probably costs them a lot of time and money to create and maintain) why shouldn't they get paid?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>